Legal Opinion

Watts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided July 8, 1985No. 3246 (2246A)Published

1Opinion of the Court

TARIFF, J.,

— Presently before thie court is plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is denied, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 1701, Pa. R.A.P. which provides that after an appeal is taken of a judicial order, the trial court may no longer proceed further in the matter.

' On March 22, 1984, and June 21, 1984, this court filed memoranda opinions .granting motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment in favor of defendants Armstrong World Industries Inc. and Pittsburgh Coming Corporation. In these opinions, we concluded that under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Connor v. Allegheny General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Cianchetti v. KaylenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Puleo v. Broad Street HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API