Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 31, 1986No. 79 C 4373PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NORDBERG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) for partial summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, the EEOC’s motion is denied.
Facts
In its motion, the EEOC moved the court to grant partial summary judgment against defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) as to liability on the following claims:
1. Sears violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, § 701 et seq., as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), by limiting the working hours of women…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Lynda Fallon v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- EEOC v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.