Carhart v. White Mantel & Tile Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County. — * H. L. McCluing, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister
The object of this bill is to collect an alleged balance due complainant on rentals of a storehouse situated on Jackson street in the city of Knoxville. The solution of the question of liability on the part of the defendant depends on the proper construction of a written lease executed by the parties.
The complainant, H. B. Carhart, is a resident of the city of New York, and through his agent, Alex. McMillan, leased the premises in question to the White Mantel & Tile Company. The material portion's of the lease necessary to be quoted are as follows:
“This indenture, made this 26th day of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Stone v. St. Louis Stamping Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Murtland v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Insurance & Law Building Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Terstegge v. First German Mutual Benevolent SocietyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ellis v. Pauline S. Sprouse Residuary TrustTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Womble v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Miller v. Albany Lodge No. 206Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- H. H. Rosin Co. v. ChavinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Harris v. GindesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.