Legal Opinion

J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 2016No. A14-863Published

1Dissent · LillehaugLillehaug, Justice

The requirements in the Minnesota Prevailing Wage Act (MPWA) for state high*12way projects are straightforward. So is the administrative rule that implements them. A laborer working for a contractor or subcontractor that has agreed “to do all or part of the work under a contract” is entitled to be paid at the prevailing wage rate. In these cases, prime Contractors entered into contracts with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to do state highway work. Each prime contractor entered into contracts with subcontractors to do some- of the work. To do their work, the subcontractors…

Also in this document: Dissent · Stras.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Al-Maliki v. LaGrantMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Billion v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API