Graff 226507 v. Shinn

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bryan Scott Graff, No. CV-20-01179-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff Graff’s two motions in limine (Docs. 143-144) and 16 Defendant DeGuilio’s four motions in limine (Docs. 147-150). The Court will address 17 each issue in turn. 18 I. Legal Standard 19 “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit particular testimony or 20 evidence in advance. United States v. Heller,

551 F.3d 1108, 1111

(9th Cir. 2009). Courts 21 generally…