Legal Opinion
MACK-TANSMORE v. MR. JONES
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00689Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HASHEAM MACK-TANSMORE, Case No. 2:20-cv-0689-JDW , v. MR. JONES, , MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Hasheam Mack-Tansmore alleges that Correctional Officer Green, Correctional Officer Lee, Correctional Officer Henderson, and maintenance worker Mr. Jones violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The evidence in this case does not support his argument. Therefore, the Court grants Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and enters judgment against Mr. Mack-Tansmore. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts 1. Bunk assignment During the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.