Dudley v. Agniel
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.
This declaratory judgment action presents the issue of whether section 559.115.7, RSMo (Cum.Supp.2004), 1 can be applied retroactively so as to reduce the number of previous “prison commitments” attributed to an offender for purposes of determining parole eligibility under section 558.019.2 RSMo (2000). The circuit court held that the statute can be applied retroactively. Following the rationale of State ex rel Nixon v. Russell, 129 S.W.3d 867 (Mo. banc 2004), this Court holds that section 559.115.7 can be applied retroactively because the statute is a parole…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LawhornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Cox v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
3Cited by14 opinions
- Investors Title Co., Inc. v. HammondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Zach McGuire v. Kenoma, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Dolan v. PowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Garr v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Coldiron v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.