Appel v. Smith
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, District Judge.
There appears to be no need for a recital of the pertinent facts; they are not in dispute. The conclusion to be drawn from these facts, that is whether or not a valid bona fide partnership was formed by the plaintiff, his wife and three daughters, is the single question to be decided. The partnership arrangement must be tested solely as to whether the plaintiff and his family were carrying on a partnership within the meaning of Section 181 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 181. Its validity except tax-*174wise is not in issue and the decision here is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Harrison v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burnet v. LeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Appel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947