Legal Opinion
O'BRYANT v. City of Midland
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 28, 1997No. 03-96-00130-CVPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
CARROLL, Chief Justice.
Our opinion and judgment issued March 6, 1997, are withdrawn, and the following is issued in lieu thereof.
Appellants are several police officers who sued their supervisors and the city that employed them, alleging the defendants had committed unlawful employment practices. The trial court adjudicated the multiple statutory, constitutional, and common law causes of action and two affirmative defenses by granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We will affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate a portion of the judgment, dismiss one cause…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Huckabay v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Nueces County v. Ferguson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Haynes v. City of Beaumont, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Frasier v. Yanes, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- City of Round Rock v. Whiteaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.