Legal Opinion
Beckford v. Esper
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 3, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2018-0940Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHAWLAWN BECKFORD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-940 (JEB) MARK T. ESPER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Shawlawn Beckford served as an Army employee in South Korea from 2009 to 2015. Believing that she had been discriminated and retaliated against on the basis of her race and sex during her tenure, Plaintiff brought the current action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Defendant Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army, now moves to dismiss or, in the alternative, transfer the case to the Eastern District of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- John Sinclair v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Emmett J. Stebbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Iinsurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.