Cephas v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice.
In this appeal, we consider whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction of second degree assault where the defendant was charged with assaulting a pregnant female. The victim believed that she was pregnant, although she had a condition called a “molar pregnancy,” and medical tests established that there was no fetal tissue in the mole. The State’s purported expert, who was unable to provide a medical definition of pregnancy, nonetheless testified that a molar pregnancy is considered a pregnancy. We conclude that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- State v. DembySupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- State v. TayeSuperior Court of Delaware · 2009
- Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- DNREC v. McGinnis Auto & Mobile Home Salvage, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.