Legal Opinion

Cephas v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 15, 2006No. 619, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction of second degree assault where the defendant was charged with assaulting a pregnant female. The victim believed that she was pregnant, although she had a condition called a “molar pregnancy,” and medical tests established that there was no fetal tissue in the mole. The State’s purported expert, who was unable to provide a medical definition of pregnancy, nonetheless testified that a molar pregnancy is considered a pregnancy. We conclude that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. State v. DembySupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. State v. TayeSuperior Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. DNREC v. McGinnis Auto & Mobile Home Salvage, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API