Legal Opinion

Milner Hotels, Inc. v. Mecklenburg Hotel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1979No. 7826SC914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the admission into evidence of a Western Union Mailgram.' The mailgram was a material part of the plaintiff’s case since the terms of the lease required that notice of the termination of the lease be in writing. The mailgram was the only written notice of termination that the plaintiff offered evidence of having received. In support of this assignment of error, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting the mailgram because it was not properly authenticated. We do not agree.

Generally, a writing must be authenticated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walton v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Henrico Lumber Co. v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Lumber Co. v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Piedmont Cattle Credit Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MercerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API