State v. Young

WYNN, Judge.

In reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, we consider “whether the trial court’s findings of fact are supported by the evidence and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law.” 1 Here, Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the trial court’s findings of fact are incomplete and irrational in light of the evidence presented. Because the trial court’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, we affirm.

At trial, the State presented evidence that tended to show that on 12 October 2003,…