Commonwealth v. Schutte
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor. We reverse on the ground that the judge erroneously excluded a report from the defendant’s physician that was admissible under G. L. c. 233, § 79G. We also briefly discuss other issues.
1. Evidence at trial. There was testimony from Officer William Quigley of the Cohasset police that, on May 26, 1997, at about 12:50 a.m., he saw a vehicle being driven erratically. When he stopped the vehicle and approached the driver, later identified as the defendant, he detected a strong smell of alcohol coming…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. SandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. MosbyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ScanlonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. HaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PalaciosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- O'MALLEY v. SoskeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Carroca v. WelshMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Commonwealth v. CrombieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.