Hahn v. Kroll
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
— The plaintiffs brought this action on a promissory note executed by defendant, Kroll, doing business as Arthur H. Kroll Lumber Company. Kroll only was served, and he answered, admitting the execution of the note. By way of affirmative defense, however, he alleged that the note had been paid. He alleged that he had made an assignment for the benefit of creditors; that plaintiffs had agreed to the assignment, waiving all personal claims against him; and that they had accepted dividends paid by the assignee.
Replying to the affirmative matter set up in the answer, plaintiffs admitted the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coursey v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Farrington v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Cerf, Schloss & Co. v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Hubbard v. McNaughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Kleine, Timberman & Co. v. NieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.