Legal Opinion

Cerf, Schloss & Co. v. Wallace

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1896No. 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County — Hon. W. H. Pritchard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

On May 22,1891, the Tacoma Crockery and Bazaar Company, a corporation of this state, then insolvent, made an assignment of all of its property, consisting principally of a stock of goods, to the respondent Wallace, in trust for the benefit of all of its creditors. Said assignment was duly recorded and the assignee went into immediate possession of the property, and thereafter proceeded to dispose of the same and to distribute the proceeds ratably among all of the creditors of the insolvent corporation. Some months *250after_the execution of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moller v. . TuskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Adlum v. YardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  3. Gutzwiller v. LackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Lanahan v. LatrobeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  5. Frierson v. BranchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rudebeck v. SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. Peterson v. Bergman Cabinet Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Titlow v. MacPhailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  4. Boston National Bank v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Armour & Co. v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API