Legal Opinion

United States Department of State v. Coombs

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 3, 2006No. Civil Action 04-0025 (RMU)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment

I. INTRODUCTION

This case comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). On March 24, 2005, the court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings 1 and denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, the U.S. Department of State (the “State Department” or the “government”), now seeks to alter or amend that judgment on two grounds. First, the plaintiff argues that the court erred…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fritch v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API