Legal Opinion
Greenspan v. Travelers Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
The novelty of this action lies in the necessity for legal interpretation of certain phraseology heretofore not legally defined or interpreted in this State. The action was submitted to this court upon an agreed statement of facts.
The action is one to recover $23,143.20 plus interest, from defendant based upon a group accident and sickness policy *44providing for major medical expense benefits issued by it on March 28, 1960, as amended by various riders covering the employees of the employer.
Plaintiffs decedent, Alan Greenspan, was an employee of a firm of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Griffey v. New York Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Janneck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Matthews v. . American Central Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Darrow v. . Family Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hunacek v. Union Welfare Fund Local 202New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Scotia Associates v. BondCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Terminix International Co. v. Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- American National Bank & Trust Co. v. SteinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.