Legal Opinion

State v. Barnard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2007No. COA06-209PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

Defendant was charged in bills of indictment with two counts of possession of cocaine and two counts of having achieved the status of an habitual felon. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence seized as a result of searches of his vehicle and his person, as well as statements which he made to the police. After a hearing, the motion to suppress was denied. Defendant was convicted by a jury of two counts of possession of cocaine and subsequently entered a plea of guilty to one count of having achieved the status of an habitual felon. The remaining habitual felon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. CarrouthersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. StittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API