Legal Opinion
Freeman v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 23, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-10629-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 13, 2001, the petitioner, William E. Freeman, Jr. (“Freeman”) filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his criminal conviction or, in the alternative, his sentence. [Docket No. 1]. Freeman claims that the government’s failure to provide him with a copy of a September II, 1998 letter from a Dr. Loren Schechter (“the Schechter letter”), the psychiatrist for Amy Clarke (“Clarke”), represented a violation of Freeman’s constitutional right to due process and was a violation of Brady v.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- J.E. Pierce Apothecary, Inc. v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- United States v. DenunzioDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- United States v. GouldDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008