Legal Opinion

United States v. Denunzio

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 14, 2015No. Criminal No. 14-10284-NMGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL AND REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (DOCK- ■ ■ ET ENTRY # 168)

BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge

Defendants Dustin J. DeNunzio (“defendant DeNunzio”), Anthony Gattineri (“defendant Gattineri”) and Charles A. Light-body (“defendant Lightbody”), (collectively “defendants”) move to compel two categories of exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) (“Brady”). (Docket Entry # 168). The government opposes production. (Docket Entry # 178)."

The first category consists of purportedly…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API