Legal Opinion

City of Huntington v. Huntington Water Corp.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1937No. 8458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

The City recovered a judgment against the Water Corporation for a tax charge of one per cent of its gross revenue, for the fiscal year of 1934-5. The ordinance thereon was passed in September, 1934, and reenacted in April, 1935. The part imposing the charge follows:

“There is hereby laid and imposed upon every public utility using the streets of the City of Huntington for the purpose of laying pipe, pipe lines, tracks and other means of conveyance of any persons or any produce or energy excepting steam railroads, a charge equal to one per cent (1%) of the gross revenue derived…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Erie Railway Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cogan v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Town of Burnsville v. Kwik-Pik, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Eastham v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Eastham v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API