Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Johnson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1892No. 3219PublishedCited by 11 opinions

No statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Judge,

Section B. — This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff (appellee) by stepping into an open ditch in a public street in the city of Port Worth, and breaking his leg.

The case was originally brought against W. A. Huffman and the city of Port Worth as codefendants, but during its pendency in the District Court W. A. Huffman died, and by supplemental petition Sallie Huffman, as representative and executrix of said W. A. Huffman, was made codefendant with appellant. Defendant Sallie Huffman’s exception to plaintiff’s petition was sustained by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bonner v. GlennTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Howard Oil Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Bonner and Eddy v. BeanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Harris v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Austin Electric Railway Co. v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. City of Austin v. NucholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. City of San Angelo v. SitasTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Davis v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API