Legal Opinion
Baum v. NEWBRY
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1954PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, C. J.
David C. Baum, a member of the state legislature from Union county, instituted suit for a declaratory judgment against Earl T. Newbry, Secretary of State, and Bobert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, to determine the validity of the amendment to article IV, § 6, of the Oregon Constitution, adopted by the people via the initiative in 1952, which deals with the reapportionment of members of the legislative assembly. By reason of such amendment plaintiff’s legislative district has been enlarged to include Wallowa county. The trial court permitted Bichard Deich, Olga Freeman and Walter H. Dodd to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kiernan v. Portland, OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Andrews v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.