Legal Opinion
SD Sales Corp. v. Doltex Fabrics Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 10, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. Super. 586 (1966)
224 A.2d 345
S.D. SALES CORP., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DOLTEX FABRICS CORP., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 10, 1966.
Mr. Herbert F. Savoye, Jr. attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Walter R. Cohn for defendant (Messrs. Cohn & Turk, attorneys).
BOTTER, J.S.C.
The issue posed is whether the court should invoke the doctrine of forum non conveniens to decline jurisdiction in an action commenced by attachment. Both parties are New York corporations not authorized to do business in New Jersey; plaintiff can…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Plum v. Tampax, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Semanishin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SD Sales Corp. v. Doltex Fabrics Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Sentry Insurance v. Sky Management, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999