Legal Opinion
Kind v. Markham
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
This is an application for leave to intervene as parties plaintiff in the above entitled action pursuant to Rule 24, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
*266The applicants are remaindermen under a trust created by one Hermann Kind in 1928, and the present plaintiffs are the trustees.
The suit involves a claim against the Alien Property Custodian for return of 100 shares of capital stock of Graef & Schmidt, Inc., vested by the Alien Property Custodian on the grounds that the said corporation was a national of a designated enemy country, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Klein v. Nu-Way Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Owen v. Paramount Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- United States v. C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harry J. Stadin v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- Kheel v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Bernstein v. N. v. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.