Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Grubel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 12, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

In this proceeding one of the trustees requests a construction of paragraph Sixth dealing with the power to invade the principal for the benefit of his cotrustee, who is the income beneficiary and testator’s widow.

Paragraph Sixth of the will reads in part as follows:

“All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, and so much of the parts hereinabove devised that may have lapsed because of the failure of heirs, I give, devise and bequeath unto my beloved wife, irene grubel and my good friends Isidore j. fox, also known as i. j. fox, fifth avenue furrier, of New York City…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holden v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Rezzemini v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. In Re the Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of RockwellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  5. In re SternNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Wyoming v. FinkbinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. In re JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  4. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of FlyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API