Legal Opinion

Roy John Taylor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1964No. 7598, 7599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was tried and convicted, in non-jury trials, upon each count of an indictment charging him with two separate violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 111, and upon two counts of a second indictment charging him with violations of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5604(a) and 5686(a). Pie appeals asserting three grounds for a reversal: (1) The first indictment is legally insufficient to charge an offense under § 111; (2) certain evidence admitted at the trial on the second indictment was obtained by an illegal search and seizure and should have been excluded; and (3) the evidence is insufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph Daniel Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. James William Nash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Frank SaldanaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Gilberto Nevarez-AlcantarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. SpeersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API