Legal Opinion

Martin v. Auto Finance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1930No. 1917Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellants have filed herein a motion for rehearing in which they urge all of their ground presented on original hearing. We shall notice specifically but two of the assignments here presented.

Appellants’ ninth and twelfth assignments in the motion for rehearing assert that the court erred in holding that there was no evidence in the record showing a sale of the property involved herein by appellee to appellants, and insist that there was ample evidence to raise said issue. As supporting this contention, appellants quote the following from the testimony of B. V.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mercer v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Johnson v. ShrewsburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API