Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Hall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The appellees sued the appellant upon a promissory note. The defendant in the court below pleaded a failure of con■sideration, and alleged that the note sued on was given to the intestate, Anderson, as a part of the price of a negro man sold by him to the defendant, and warranted sound, but which proved to be unsound and valueless. The defendants prayed judgment against the plaintiffs for two hundred dollars, a part of the purchase money, which had already been paid.

Read the full summary

The appellees sued the appellant upon a promissory note. The defendant in the court below pleaded a failure of con■sideration, and alleged that the note sued on was given to the intestate, Anderson, as a part of the price of a negro man sold by him to the defendant, and warranted sound, but which proved to be unsound and valueless. The defendants prayed judgment against the plaintiffs for two hundred dollars, a part of the purchase money, which had already been paid. At the trial, a number of witnesses testified on the part of ■both plaintiffs and defendant, respecting the condition of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice 'Wheeler

delivered the opinion of the court.

That the charge of the court embraces erroneous propositions is not, of itself, a sufficient cause for reversing a judgment, where, upon the whole, the charge given was not unfavorable to the party seeking the reversal. 4 Litt. 217; 3 J. J. Marsh. 508; id. 717; 6 Monr. 61; 21 Wend. 354; 23-id. 79; 25 id. 417.

It may be true in the case before us, that the court erred in stating to the j ury that the defendant, under the plea of a total failure of consideration, could not have the benefit of showing a partial failure; yet if the effect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co. v. BelknapNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Mansfield v. WheelerNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Clift v. StockdonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glasscock v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Moreland v. BarnhartTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Sloan v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. DelahuntyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Texas Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API