Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 25-79, (1979)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided March 2, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES MOHR, District Attorney Vilas County

Prior to the recent expiration of his term, your predecessor, Timothy Vocke, had asked whether a cash bond which has been declared forfeited, as authorized by sec. 969.13, Stats., may be used to pay restitution to the victim of the crime with which the forfeiting defendant was charged. My opinion is that a forfeited cash bond may not be used for that purpose.

A court's order declaring the bail to be forfeited may be set aside if justice does not appear to require its enforcement. Sec.969.13 (2), Stats. Prior to the time that judgment for the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Public Lands v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State ex rel. Guenther v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State v. WettsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Commonwealth v. JakubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CetnarowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. State v. CetnarowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API