Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1994No. 93SC663Published

1DissentJustice Vollack

The majority holds section 8-43-307, 3B C.R.S. (1994 Supp.), unconstitutional because it deprives Allison of access to the courts as guaranteed by Article II, Section 6, of the Colorado Constitution. Maj. op. at 1115. In so holding, the majority concludes that the court of appeals’ denial of certiorari does not constitute a review on the merits. I disagree and dissent because I consider certiorari review by the court of appeals of the decision of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office as satisfying the state constitutional requirement that the courts of justice shall be open to every person.

Certi…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Younger v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API