Morgan v. State

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Revandez Santonio Morgan guilty of armed robbery, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Morgan appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. He also claims that the trial court erred in not severing his trial from that of his co-defendant, Reginald Harris, and in allowing the prosecutor to make improper closing arguments to the jury. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict and…