Legal Opinion

Day v. Townsend

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1922No. 284-3532PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of' Second Supreme Judicial District. Suit by F. E. Day and others against F. W. Townsend and others. Judgment for the plaintiffs was reversed and remanded by the ■Court of Civil Appeals (224 S. W. 283), and the plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtPowelb, J.

On the 14th day of February, 1018, W. L. Thornton and wife executed a certain oil and gas mining lease in favor of F. W. Townsend, who placed the same of record in the office of the registrar of deeds of Erath county, Tex., where the 110 acres of land covered by said lease was situated.

An oil boom struck this section in the summer of 1918, and especially at Desdemona. On September 3, 1918, the legal title to said lease was in Townsend, but an equitable interest therein was owned by S. W. Bishop and J. M. Higginbotham. On the date last aforesaid, F. E. Day entered into a verbal contract with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Campbell v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Vineyard v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Falls Land & Cattle Co. v. ChisholmTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Griel v. LomaxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Starkey v. Texas Farm Mortg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. CrabbTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Campbell v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Dominion Oil Co. v. PouCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Steinberger Petroleum Corp. v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API