Insurance Co. v. Crunk
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM LINCOLN. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Lincoln County. M. D. Smallman, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.
The defendant in error brought this suit against The London and Lancashire Eire Insurance Company to recover for loss sustained by fire, which destroyed his buildings, insured by said company.
The policy contained a clause providing that, “if the building or any part thereof fall except as the result of fire, all insurance by this . policy on such building or its contents shall immediately cease.”
There was no averment in the declaration that *378the building insured and no part thereof fell except as the result of fire, and the defendant demurred because of the failure of plaintiff to make such…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Tillis v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. J. H. Mohlman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- N. & M. Friedman Co. v. Atlas Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Home Mutual Insurance v. Tompkies & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.