Legal Opinion
N. & M. Friedman Co. v. Atlas Assurance Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1903No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by the N. & M. Friedman Company against the Atlas Assurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
In the court below, plaintiff recovered & verdict and judgment against the defendant for loss *214under an insurance policy. This policy was a Michigan standard policy. It bore date August 31, 1900, and, for the term of one year from September 10, 1900, insured plaintiff, to an amount not exceeding $2,000, on its stock of merchandise, situated at Nos. 70 and 72 Monroe street, Grand Rapids, Mich. The policy contained these clauses:
“Other concurrent insurance permitted.”
“This company shall not be liable under this policy for a greater proportion of any loss on the described property * * * than the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Jones v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Slocovich v. Orient Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Benanti v. Delaware InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Blickley v. Luce's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Sailer v. FurcheTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Greenwich Ins. v. N. & M. Friedman Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- O'Donnell v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.