Gilbert v. Rogers
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
— We have here another appeal involving only a factual dispute which the trial court resolved upon conflicting evidence. Again we restate the rule applicable under such circumstances: The appellate function begins and ends with ascertaining whether or not there is substantial evidence supporting the findings of fact. If so, the judgment must be affirmed. This court does not retry factual disputes.
The appellants, defendants below, appeal from a judgment against them on two causes of action, the first for fraud in inducing the respondent to enter into a logging contract, and the second for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stewart v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Kelly v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Kleinlein's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Fitzgerald v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Varrelman v. BlountWashington Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.