Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Hopkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1967No. 38535PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J. —

At the trial level this case presented a scintillating and intriguing dissertation on the art of sculpturing. It loses much of its glitter on appeal, however, for it presents, basically, a fact question.

Plaintiff, James H. Fitzgerald, 54. years of age, alleges in his complaint and amended complaint that “he has established himself over a period of years, as one of the foremost sculptors in the Northwest.” The trial court found, and the evidence supports the finding, that plaintiff “is one of the leading sculptors of the Pacific Northwest.” In its oral opinion the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malstrom v. KallandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lake Air, Inc. v. DuffyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Grein v. LaPomaWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cohen v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cunningham v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Exner v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Reed v. MelnickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API