Legal Opinion

Joseph v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2001No. S-8518Published

1Opinion of the Court

26 P.3d 459 (2001)

Joe JOSEPH and Judith Joseph, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Rudolph Joseph, Appellants,

v.

STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. S-8518.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 13, 2001.

C.R. Kennelly and Michael A. Stepovich, Stepovich, Kennelly & Stepovich, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellants.

Richard Keck, Assistant Attorney General, Fairbanks, and Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellee.

Before MATTHEWS, Chief Justice, EASTAUGH, FABE, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jailer owes its prisoners the duty of reasonable care to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API