Legal Opinion

Torres Rosado v. Rotger-Sabat

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided May 7, 2002No. CIV.00-1899-JPPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PIERAS, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Court currently has before it co-Defendants Aníbal Torres Rivera, José Fuentes Agostini and Angel Rotger Sa-bat’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket No. 143). Since more than ten days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition thereto, both motions stand unopposed. See Local Rule 311.5. Therefore, all uncontested facts in the two motions are deemed and accepted as true. 1

Co-Defendants allege that summary judgment should be granted in their favor on all counts, and in addition, allege that they are entitled to…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Butner v. Department of State PoliceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Monfort-Rodriguez v. Rey-HernandezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  4. Ramos-Santos v. Hernandez-NoguerasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  5. Tejada-Batista v. Fuentes-AgostiniDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API