Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1978No. 77-4954 C.A. 10312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of perjury (ORS 162.065). The relevant facts are set out in our opinion of today in State v. Belva Marie Ray (CA 10294), 36 Or App 367, 584 P2d 362 (1978). We agree with the defendant that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial based on a comment by the prosecuting attorney which revealed to the jury that a trier of fact in an earlier proceeding had found adversely to defendant on the same factual issues which were dispositive here.

The defendant was charged with making false sworn statements in a civil proceeding which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API