State v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions after trial to the court for first-degree official misconduct and first-degree perjury. He assigns seven errors. The first two concern challenges to the grand jury indictments. Assignments three, four - and five concern nondisclosure of grand jury transcripts. Assignment six concerns admissibility of testimony of a witness about one end of a telephone conversation. In assignment seven, defendant challenges the materiality of his allegedly perjured testimony. We reverse on the issue of nondisclosure of grand jury transcripts and remand for a new trial. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MichenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. MattilaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. MoineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. SchlesserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986