Legal Opinion

State v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1984No. 10-79-10819 and 10-79-10820; CA A20215 & A20216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions after trial to the court for first-degree official misconduct and first-degree perjury. He assigns seven errors. The first two concern challenges to the grand jury indictments. Assignments three, four - and five concern nondisclosure of grand jury transcripts. Assignment six concerns admissibility of testimony of a witness about one end of a telephone conversation. In assignment seven, defendant challenges the materiality of his allegedly perjured testimony. We reverse on the issue of nondisclosure of grand jury transcripts and remand for a new trial. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. MichenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. State v. MattilaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. MoineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. SchlesserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API