Legal Opinion

State v. Carey

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 30, 1991No. 8556PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation. He claims that the evidence presented at his revocation hearing (1) was insufficient as a matter of law, (2) violated his constitutional right to due process of law, and (3) violated his right to cross-examine witnesses. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The record discloses that on June 13, 1988, the defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 and was sentenced to ninety days in the custody of the commissioner of correction. The defendant’s sentence was suspended and he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. MarchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. State v. CareyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API