Legal Opinion

United States v. Dodge

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1925No. 2555PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Rugs made wholly of cotton were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as manufactures, in any form, made or cut from cotton pile fabrics. In accordance with that classification the importation was assessed for duty at 50 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 910 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 910. * * * manufactures, in any form, made or cut from cotton pile fabrics, 50 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested that the goods were rugs made wholly of cotton and that they were dutiable under that part of paragraph 1022 of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Akawo & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  5. Cohn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API