Legal Opinion

Catalan v. House of Raeford

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided April 24, 2014No. 7:13-CV-106-FPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendant House of Raeford’s motion for summary judgment [DE-15]. Catalan did not file a response brief and the matter is now ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, the motion is ALLOWED and Catalan’s claims are DISMISSED.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Catalan, proceeding pro se, alleges that House of Raeford discriminated against him on the basis of his Latino race when it failed to promote him to a supervisor position and ultimately terminated his employment. Specifically, Catalan alleges he was “the only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luqmaan v. Volvo Group North America, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Knott v. McDonald's Restaurants of Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API