Legal Opinion
United States v. Karen L. Hinkle
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 13, 1981No. 80-1452PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge.
Appellant was charged in a multi-count indictment for various drug offenses, and the jury found her guilty on all but one count. 1 She was given concurrent sentences under the Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b). On appeal, she alleges that six counts of her indictment were fatally defective because they failed to allege a specific felony. She also argues that the district court judge should have granted her motion for acquittal because the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was not entrapped. We agree with the appellant that six counts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Irving L. NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Charles J. Spears, Also Known as "Blackie," and Donald Meeks, United States of America v. Kim CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.