Irwin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NUGENT, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Irwin appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and SmithKline Bioscience Laboratories, Ltd. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff raises nine points on appeal. We do not address each point individually, in part because several points raise issues similar to each other, and in part because the plaintiff, in violation of Rule 84.04(d), has failed to cite any authority to support his arguments on five points, Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 687 (Mo.1978) (en banc); Ortmeyer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Labor Discount Center, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ronollo v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Pulliam v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Manor Square, Inc. v. Heartthrob of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Santiago v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Rustco Products Co. v. Food Corn, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rodin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Preston v. PrestonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.