Legal Opinion

Halter v. Eichenlaub

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 25, 2008No. Case 07-CV-11072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S PRO SE, EX PARTE MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE ORDER OF PROTECTION AND CEASE AND DESIST, AND MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE TO JUDGMENT, AND WRIT OF EXECUTION INSTANTER, AND MOTION FOR EXPEDITIOUS ADJUDICATION AND EXECUTION, AND MOTION TO PROCEED PRO SE AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AVERN COHN, District Judge.

I

This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which he challenged the policies of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) concerning his eligibility for placement in a Community Corrections Center (“CCC”). On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carrie Gentry v. Doris Deuth, Warden, Kentucky Correctional Institute for WomenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. In Re Denny Roy Shelton, Jr., MovantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Benson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API