Legal Opinion
Selevan v. New York Thruway Authority
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 18, 2007No. 1:06-cv-00291PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SHARPE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs allege, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that defendants violated their constitutional rights by implementing and enforcing discriminatory toll practices on Grand Island Bridge in Grand Island, New York. Pending under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is defendants’ motion to dismiss. See Dkt. Nos. 6, 21. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted.
II. Facts
Robert Selevan resides in Nassau County, New York. See Am. Compl. ¶ 5, Dkt. No. 20. Anne Rubin is a United States citizen residing in Ontario,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Selevan v. New York Thruway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Janes v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Riverview Mews, LLC v. Richard Electric, Inc. Steven L. Richard, & Margaret RichardVermont Superior Court · 2008