Legal Opinion
Ducey v. Dambacher
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 21, 1938No. Civ. 5884PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
In this appeal an opinion was filed affirming the judgment, and upon our motion a rehearing was granted in order to give the question further consideration. Further study has again satisfied us that the judgment should be affirmed.
Plaintiff: herein is and was at the times herein mentioned the owner of a tract of land in Tuolumne County. The assessment rolls of that county show delinquent unpaid taxes against the land for the years 1893, 1896 and 1897, and noted on the assessment rolls against the property was, “Sold to the State”. No proceedings had been taken to sell the property at public…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Conley v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weber v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Paul v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Stevens v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Biaggi v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- United States v. 0.13 Acre, More or Less, Sit. in Kanawha Cty., State of WvDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004